31. Fright Night (1985), dir. Tom Holland
Wednesday, 23 January 2019 20:15![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
I saw this in late October when I went to the Whitby Goth Festival for the first time in some 17 years (yikes!). I don't think I ever wrote about that at all here on LJ / DW, but anyway it was very nice - I attended a Dracula-themed literary salon, hung out with multiple chums and of course did a bit of shopping. The festival has naturally evolved a little since Ye Olden Days, but this year also saw a particular change in that a completely different set of organisers booked the Spa for the dates of the usual Goth weekend, and put on some more recognisably Goth bands than have been booked in recent years, as well as dipping a toe in the waters of associated film screenings and related talks. Hence it was that I got to see Fright Night, along with
big_daz,
avaritia and her partner.
Its OTT black comedy style and special effects reminded me a bit of An American Werewolf in London, and Roddy McDowall was a great as you would expect him to be as Peter Vincent, a washed-up horror film star making a living in TV. His trajectory in the story is the same as that of the star-ship crew in Galaxy Quest - an enthusiastic fan turns to him in the belief that he's a 'real' vampire hunter, and after initially trying to protest that he is no such thing he eventually rises to the challenge. It's a motif I like, both because it's a nice meta poke at the relationship between drama and reality, but also because the way the character it's happening to both adopts the role as a kindness to another person and finds themselves living up to that person's expectations, giving a heart-warming perspective on human nature. Other than the lovely Roddy, though, the rest of the cast failed to wow me. There was a lot of very mannered acting going on, by people who don't seem to have had much of a subsequent career.
I also felt there was a distinctly homophobic undertone to the portrayal of the main vampire, played by Jerry Dandrige. He moves into the house next door to the main point-of-view character (the enthusiastic teenage fan of Roddy McDowall) with a male human companion, and they are shown at various points with their arms draped around each other, and in one scene with the human on his knees and his head in the general vicinity of the vampire's groin. (There's a nominally non-sexual explanation for this, but the director definitely intended it to look like giving head). When the vampire turns the main character's friend, 'Evil Ed' down a dark alley, he says some dialogue to him about he knows what it's like always feeling different and being an outsider, and when Ed is later staked (in wolf form), there are some very suggestive shots of his hand grabbing at the stake in his own chest. Since the vampire is (obviously) the villain, this all basically boils down to coding him as an Evil Gay, and I think two particular contemporary fears are played out through him as well: him moving in next door with his human lover makes him a Gay Neighbour, and his interaction with Ed equates to Recruiting Your Children. It's all very AIDS-hysteria, and really tainted the film for me.
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
Its OTT black comedy style and special effects reminded me a bit of An American Werewolf in London, and Roddy McDowall was a great as you would expect him to be as Peter Vincent, a washed-up horror film star making a living in TV. His trajectory in the story is the same as that of the star-ship crew in Galaxy Quest - an enthusiastic fan turns to him in the belief that he's a 'real' vampire hunter, and after initially trying to protest that he is no such thing he eventually rises to the challenge. It's a motif I like, both because it's a nice meta poke at the relationship between drama and reality, but also because the way the character it's happening to both adopts the role as a kindness to another person and finds themselves living up to that person's expectations, giving a heart-warming perspective on human nature. Other than the lovely Roddy, though, the rest of the cast failed to wow me. There was a lot of very mannered acting going on, by people who don't seem to have had much of a subsequent career.
I also felt there was a distinctly homophobic undertone to the portrayal of the main vampire, played by Jerry Dandrige. He moves into the house next door to the main point-of-view character (the enthusiastic teenage fan of Roddy McDowall) with a male human companion, and they are shown at various points with their arms draped around each other, and in one scene with the human on his knees and his head in the general vicinity of the vampire's groin. (There's a nominally non-sexual explanation for this, but the director definitely intended it to look like giving head). When the vampire turns the main character's friend, 'Evil Ed' down a dark alley, he says some dialogue to him about he knows what it's like always feeling different and being an outsider, and when Ed is later staked (in wolf form), there are some very suggestive shots of his hand grabbing at the stake in his own chest. Since the vampire is (obviously) the villain, this all basically boils down to coding him as an Evil Gay, and I think two particular contemporary fears are played out through him as well: him moving in next door with his human lover makes him a Gay Neighbour, and his interaction with Ed equates to Recruiting Your Children. It's all very AIDS-hysteria, and really tainted the film for me.
no subject
Date: Wednesday, 23 January 2019 21:54 (UTC)I adore Roddy McDowall in this movie.
It's all very AIDS-hysteria, and really tainted the film for me.
I am sorry. I agree that Jerry is not very subtly queer, but for whatever reason the even-handedness of his pursuit of Amy as well as Ed defused a lot of the predatory gay implications for me; I was not left finding it the dominant note in his vampirism as opposed to the part where he's sort of a giant fruit bat.
no subject
Date: Wednesday, 23 January 2019 22:42 (UTC)I knew that, if you had seen it, you would have done. :-) You do him great justice in your review. And I see we've said very same things about the actor-mistaken-for-their-character motif, though of course you're dead right that he is snippier about taking on the role at first than I've suggested in my own review (the hazards of not writing these things up until several months after seeing the film). I'm taking up your suggestion to see My Favorite Year (1982), because I love both this trope and Peter O'Toole, so it sounds like a winner for me.
You're very right about the ickiness of Charley's attitude to Amy, though I think that didn't bother me as much because I just categorised it as 'typical teen movie stuff' - by which I mean to say that yes, it was icky, but it was also part of what is apparently my expected base-line for the teen movie genre, certainly of this era. You could say the same about homophobia, I suppose (i.e. that it's expected of this genre in this period), but I think it bothered me more because I was hoping for better things from and around the main vampire character. A teen romance plot I can easily compartmentalise and discount as a necessary but uninteresting component of this type of film - something I need to watch past to get to the good stuff. But the vampire was meant to be the good stuff, and for me wasn't.
no subject
Date: Thursday, 24 January 2019 05:36 (UTC)Thank you! I keep wanting to rewatch it for him.
(the hazards of not writing these things up until several months after seeing the film).
I am greatly enjoying your catch-up writeups all the same.
I'm taking up your suggestion to see My Favorite Year (1982), because I love both this trope and Peter O'Toole, so it sounds like a winner for me.
I very much hope you enjoy it! I have found that O'Toole's Alan Swann definitely holds up. It's one of the movies
though I think that didn't bother me as much because I just categorised it as 'typical teen movie stuff' - by which I mean to say that yes, it was icky, but it was also part of what is apparently my expected base-line for the teen movie genre, certainly of this era.
Whereas I don't watch a lot of '80's teen movies, so it leapt out at me as either an unnecessarily unsympathetic introduction to the protagonist or a horrific idea of what would be taken as normal and relatable on the part of the audience. (And my investment in Charley never has recovered. He's not who I want to rewatch the movie for.)
But the vampire was meant to be the good stuff, and for me wasn't.
Understood. That does leave Roddy McDowall.
no subject
Date: Thursday, 24 January 2019 10:27 (UTC)Neither do I, largely because of this sort of stuff! I've seen enough to have concluded that they're full of it.
no subject
Date: Thursday, 24 January 2019 02:46 (UTC)